Evan Mayo‐Wilson
Decision Sciences · Indiana University
Publications
288
Citations
167,690
Est. group size
—
Recurring co-author estimate
Active years
22
Publishing since 2005
Evan Mayo-Wilson works on research methods and standards for how scientific studies—especially clinical trials and systematic reviews—are conducted and reported. Much of the work focuses on improving transparency, consistent outcome reporting, and open science practices so that research findings are more complete, reproducible, and usable. This includes developing reporting guidelines (such as CONSORT and PRISMA extensions) and methods for combining and evaluating evidence across studies.
Publication activity has been steady and generally growing over the decade, with a notable spike in 2024.
Generated by claude-opus-4-8 from public bibliographic data · Jul 11, 2026
- Determining sample size for pilot trials: a tutorial
BMJ · 2025
- TOP 2025: An Update to the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines
2025
- Weighted corrected covered area (wCCA): A measure of informational overlap among reviews
Research Synthesis Methods · 2025
- Complete reporting of clinical trials requires more than journal articles
BMJ · 2025
- Consistent and Precise Description of Research Outputs Could Improve Implementation of Open Science
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · 2025
- Consistent and precise description of research outputs could improve implementation of open science
2025
- Musculoskeletal injury (MSKI) outcome definitions as reported in military population research from 2015-2025: A scoping review protocol
2025
- Consistent and precise description of research outputs could improve implementation of open science
2025
- Consistent and precise description of research outputs could improve implementation of open science
2025
- Author response for "Consistent and Precise Description of Research Outputs Could Improve Implementation of Open Science"
2025
- Author response for "Consistent and Precise Description of Research Outputs Could Improve Implementation of Open Science"
2025
- Author response for "Consistent and Precise Description of Research Outputs Could Improve Implementation of Open Science"
2025
- Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 Extension
UNC Libraries · 2024
- A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science
UNC Libraries · 2024
- Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024
Quality of Life Research · 2024
- UNC Libraries×42
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology×12
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)×8
- BMJ×6
- Trials×5
This profile was generated automatically from public scholarly data (OpenAlex). Group size and activity levels are estimates derived from co-authorship patterns.
Last updated Jul 11, 2026.
Claim or correct this profile